FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 3, 2024
Women Cross DMZ calls on President Biden, President-elect Trump, U.S. lawmakers, and democratic leaders around the world to condemn the illegal imposition of martial law by South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, and join growing South Korean calls to safeguard their hard-won democracy by calling for President Yoon’s resignation.
Thanks to a swift vote by the South Korean National Assembly and thousands of South Koreans who poured into the streets in protest, President Yoon was forced to revoke martial law. As we celebrate the power of the people to fight back, we should all be alarmed that a single individual can unilaterally endanger democracy, the safety of ordinary people, and peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula.
On December 3, 2024, President Yoon abruptly declared emergency martial law in South Korea in an unplanned national television broadcast, citing “threats posed by North Korea’s communist forces and to eliminate anti-state elements.” In the weeks leading up to this, opposition party leaders and thousands of South Koreans were calling for Yoon’s impeachment. In response to this growing outcry and in an attempt to quash dissent, Yoon declared martial law. Within two hours, 190 National Assembly Members (including members of Yoon’s own People Power Party) fought back armed special warfare soldiers who tried to seize the legislature, and unanimously voted to overturn the martial law.
Since Yoon took power in 2022, tensions between South Korea and North Korea have remained high with growing threats of renewed fighting on the Korean Peninsula. South Korea has also witnessed historic democratic backsliding as Yoon’s administration targeted critics, journalists, labor unions, and peace and reunification activists. In two years, the Yoon administration has been embroiled in a series of endless scandals including political corruption and alleged election interference. His approval rating sank to 17 percent last month. Yoon also gutted the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, blaming feminism for South Korea’s low birth rates instead of the systemic patriarchy where women earn 31 percent of their male counterparts. Last month, the Yoon administration banned Women Cross DMZ Founder Christine Ahn from entering South Korea where she was to deliver the keynote speech at an international youth peace summit in Gyeonggi Province with no explanation or due process.
President Biden has previously touted an “ironclad” alliance with Yoon’s government as his legacy. However, Yoon’s attempt to suspend democracy and human rights in South Korea demonstrates that President Biden’s close ally is unfit to govern one of Asia’s biggest democracies and puts the Korean peninsula at further risk of an outbreak of war. Before Yoon further exploits military tensions on the peninsula, Biden and world leaders must condemn Yoon’s dangerous actions and support the South Korean people and their elected officials calling for Yoon’s resignation.
Assistant Secretary of State
Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street, NW
Washington, DC 20520
August 2, 2024
Dear Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink:
This letter is for purposes of continuing our dialogue concerning the current travel ban restricting U.S. citizens from traveling freely to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). We have previously corresponded on this topic via letters dated September 6, 2022, and July 25, 2023, and in follow-up discussions with members of the State Department.
Since our first letter in 2021, our coalition has only grown. We write on behalf of a robust community of leaders from humanitarian aid, cultural, activist, legal advocacy, and civil society organizations. In light of the fact that the travel ban will be considered for renewal in the coming months, we wish to reiterate what we believe are deeply compelling reasons why the State Department should end the travel ban at this time, or at a minimum make modifications to allow for bona fide humanitarian and people-to-people engagement. With this letter, we also point out additional considerations that we urge the State Department to take into account for purposes of ending or modifying the existing travel ban. To the extent that the ban is based on concerns that U.S. citizens will be unlawfully detained, mistreated, or held hostage, we have offered information (see our July 25, 2023 letter) that strongly suggests this risk to be low, especially in comparison to other countries where the use of a U.S. passport for travel is not restricted. Suffice it to say that of the thousands of U.S. citizens (including dual U.S.-Korean citizens) who have traveled to or resided in the DPRK prior to the travel ban being instituted in 2017, only 20 were detained by or deported from North Korea.
Our recommendations are as follows:
I. The SVP policy should reflect the most recent updates to OFAC regulations.
On February 16, 2024, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published and effective that date, amendments to the North Korea Sanctions Regulations (NKSR) found at 31 C.F.R. Part 510. See https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/02/16/2024-03255/north-korea-sanctions-regulations.
The overall effect of the changes was to further expand the ability of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to engage in humanitarian activities vis-à-vis North Korea, by increasing the scope of activities now subject to a general license. For example, OFAC reduced the scope of the limitation related to activities involving a “partnership [with the North Korean government].” This was a welcome and necessary change that acknowledged the practical necessity of involving certain North Korean governmental institutions in engaging in sanctions-permitted humanitarian transactions.
In addition, the amendments expanded the permissible scope of items not subject to U.S. jurisdiction that can be provided by NGOs. Also of particular note, OFAC expanded the scope of authorized humanitarian activities to include:
While OFAC noted that a strict travel permission program remains in place for those using U.S. passports, the new amendments evince broadening support for NGO activity in North Korea, which, in most cases, necessitates traveling to North Korea to responsibly plan, implement and monitor these authorized activities. We believe it is in the interest of the U.S. government that U.S. citizens, who are otherwise delivering or arranging the delivery of authorized humanitarian aid to North Korea, be able to travel and implement the necessary control and monitoring of the delivered aid for its intended purpose.
Therefore, we urge the State Department, at the very least, to adopt explicit modifications to the travel ban, including visibly articulating policies that would permit individuals undertaking authorized activities under the North Korea Sanctions Regulations to be allowed to travel to implement those activities. As we previously noted, this should include activities authorized under section 510.512, as well as other activities that are authorized under or exempt from OFAC’s North Korea Sanctions Regulations (e.g., as discussed below, activities relating to the exchange of “information or informational materials” is an exemption from the regulations and is grounded in First Amendment protections reflected in a longstanding statute that removes OFAC’s regulatory authority in this area). We urge the Department to implement this policy by making clear that lawful activity under the NKSR is automatically deemed to be “justified by compelling humanitarian considerations” for the purpose of the special validation passport (SVP) authorization standard. The regulatory policies of agencies within the U.S. government should be aligned with each other, otherwise the travel ban policy risks undermining the permissions provided under the sanctions themselves.
Beyond this, we continue to urge the Department to amend its special validation passport (SVP) policy for the DPRK to explicitly allow travel for the purpose of constitutionally protected speech and, in particular, for the purpose of democracy-building, peace advocacy activities, and people-to-people initiatives. In light of the strong constitutional protection associated with the right to travel, we believe travel that would include First Amendment free speech in aid of such initiatives is compelling. Indeed, these types of OFAC-authorized activities are at their core exercises of free speech for the benefit of the civilian population. We believe that now is the time to consider appropriate amendments to the SVP policy to make it a more coherent part of the overall U.S. regulatory structure for the DPRK, and also more fully reflective of U.S. laws and values.
II. SVP policy should be updated to explicitly allow family reunions.
Finally, we ask that the State Department take an additional step to more explicitly incorporate a family reunion component into the SVP program, making clear that those wishing to travel to North Korea to engage in a family reunion would be eligible for SVP authorization. While we were pleased to note the update to the FAQ section in 2023 specifying that family visits would be considered potential grounds for receiving an SVP, we would like to see stronger support for family member reunions under humanitarian considerations, including those arranged by long-standing non-governmental and humanitarian organizations that have historically facilitated family reunions, and reunions for second- and third-generation Korean American family members.
In our July 2023 letter, we noted that an estimated 100,000 Korean Americans have family members in the DPRK whom they have not seen or heard from in decades. While the South Korean and North Korean governments have facilitated 21 in-person reunions and 7 video reunions since they began implementing family reunions in 1985, Korean Americans have been left out of this process entirely. Days before his election, President Biden pledged “to reunite Korean Americans separated from loved ones in North Korea for decades.” Instead, he has renewed the State Department’s travel ban on North Korea every year since he has been in office, prolonging one of the most restrictive policies from the Trump administration.
We speak on behalf of the majority of the U.S. public that supports peace and engagement. Activists have taken to directly petitioning for the lifting of the DPRK travel ban through postcard mailing efforts and online signature petitions. As of today’s date, the petition calling for lifting the travel ban has over 1,400 signatures from individuals across the United States. With Julie Turner, the U.S. special envoy for North Korean human rights, recently calling the issue of reuniting Korean Americans with their families in North Korea a matter of “utmost urgency,” the Biden administration should facilitate family reunions as quickly as possible, as time is running out, especially for elderly Korean Americans. We again note that the regulations administered by OFAC contain an exemption for travel and personal communications which is consistent with a policy of more routinely issuing SVPs for family reunion travel.
Again, we thank you for your consideration of our recommendations for ending or modifying substantially the travel ban directed at U.S. citizens who wish to pursue bona fide humanitarian and people-to-people activities in North Korea, fully consistent with U.S. economic sanctions.
Furthermore, we would welcome the opportunity for a meeting to discuss this important topic for NGOs and Korean Americans, and for those of us who are identified below. We would be happy to meet anytime between August 19 and August 23 to discuss or review these demands.
Sincerely,
Individual Signatories
Christine Ahn, Founder and Co-Director, Women Cross DMZ
Mickey Bergman, on behalf of Governor Bill Richardson Center for Global Engagement
Cathi Choi, Co-Director, Women Cross DMZ & Co-Coordinator, Korea Peace Now! Grassroots Network
Jennifer Deibert, DPRK Program Director, American Friends Service Committee
Abigail Disney, filmmaker, philanthropist and social activist
Rick Downes, President, Coalition of Families of Korean & Cold War POW/MIAs
Joy Lee Powell Gebhard, Divided Family Member
Austin Headrick, Asia Regional Advocacy Coordinator, American Friends Service Committee
Suzy Kim, Amnesty International USA (South) Korea Country Specialist
Dan Leaf, Lt. General of U.S. Air Force, former Deputy Commander of Pacific Command
Lora Lumpe, CEO, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
Orin O’Brien, Double Bass, New York Philharmonic (retired)
Kee B. Park, MD. Lecturer, Harvard Medical School
Jack Rendler, Amnesty International USA Country Specialist for North Korea & Founding Member, International Campaign to Stop Crimes Against Humanity in North Korea
Chahee Stanfield, Founder and Executive Director, National Coalition for Divided Families
Gloria Steinem, author and activist
Ann Wright, US Army Colonel and US Diplomat (retired), Veterans for Peace
Joy Yoon, Co-Founder of IGNIS Community
Organizational Signatories
American Friends Service Committee
National Association of Korean Americans
Korea Peace Now
Korean American Peace and Education Fund
Mennonite Central Committee U.S.
The United Methodist Church, Church & Society
The United Methodist Church, Global Ministries
The Peace Committee, the Korean Association of the United Methodist Church
Veterans for Peace
Women Cross DMZ
CC:
Kurt Campbell, Deputy Secretary of State
Julie Turner, Special Envoy on North Korean Human Rights Issues, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs
Kin Moy, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, East Asia and Pacific Affairs Bureau
Seth Bailey, Director for the Office of Korean and Mongolian Affairs
Karen Castro, Desk Officer – DPRK Unit
For immediate release
September 1, 2021
Korean Americans and humanitarian groups expressed anger and disappointment with the decision by the US State Department to maintain the travel ban to North Korea for another year. This means that US policy will continue to undermine family reunifications, the delivery of lifesaving humanitarian aid, and people-to-people exchanges and peace-building efforts, according to members of LIFT (Let Individuals Freely Travel), a national campaign to lift the US travel ban to North Korea.
Imposed in 2017, the travel ban prohibits U.S. citizens from traveling to, in, or through North Korea. No other country is subject to a similar ban by the United States, and only the U.S. and South Korea prohibit their citizens from traveling to North Korea. Consequently, family members separated during the Korean War remain isolated from relatives in North Korea, humanitarian workers are unable to pursue their lifesaving endeavors, and Americans from all walks of life are blocked from engaging in people-to-people exchanges that further peace and understanding.
“I’m deeply disappointed in this outcome,” said Ji-Yeon Yuh, Associate Professor of History at Northwestern University and Co-coordinator of the LIFT campaign. “The Biden administration’s decision to keep the travel ban to North Korea means that Korean Americans will remain separated from their families, urgent humanitarian assistance won’t reach North Koreans who need it most, and peacebuilding efforts and civilian exchanges will be blocked. It’s unfortunate that the Biden administration has chosen to maintain this restrictive Trump-era policy when it’s not only unnecessary, but actively harmful to so many.”
“I have a brother, sister, cousin, and aunts in North Korea. I know where they are, but I cannot visit them. One of my cousins has lung cancer, and the other one has tuberculosis,” said Choon Lim, a Korean American and member of the LIFT campaign who has not been able to see his family in North Korea since the U.S. travel ban went into effect in 2017. He says he worries about them and wonders who is still alive. “I am now 75 years old. I do not know how many more years I have left. I wish to see them again, sooner than later.”
“The Korean American community was not heard today,” said Hyun Lee, National Campaign and Advocacy Strategist of Women Cross DMZ and an organizer of the LIFT campaign. “It’s tragic that thousands of Korean families that have been separated for 70 years due to the ongoing Korean War will continue to be kept divided.”
“Lifting the travel ban would allow us to do critical, lifesaving work that will also let North Koreans know Americans as caring people, people they can understand,” said Joy Yoon, co-founder of Ignis Community, an international NGO that aids in the healthy development of North Korean children through medicine and nutrition.
While current US policy allows humanitarian workers and others acting in the “national interest” to apply for Special Validation Passports, Yoon said this process is laborious and time-consuming. Furthermore, the frequent denial of applications has discouraged most people from even applying, and the new modifications appear to do little to lessen the burdensome process and cost of applying for the Special Validation Passport.
“There’s a sense of urgency to this issue,” said Dr. Kee Park, faculty at Harvard Medical School and the director of the North Korea Program at the Korean American Medical Association. “This is not something that will work itself out over time because people’s lives are at stake.”
“One of the most unfortunate consequences of the travel ban to North Korea is that civil society peacebuilding efforts have come to a halt,” said Christine Ahn, Executive Director of Women Cross DMZ. “Had the travel ban been in effect in 2015, our historic crossing of the Demilitarized Zone and meetings with North Korean women wouldn’t have been possible. These activities are crucial to breaking down barriers, building trust, and promoting understanding.”
Members of the LIFT campaign sent a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken on August 2, 2021, and met with Biden administration officials to urge them to lift the ban. While disappointed in the outcome, LIFT organizers say they will continue to call on the Biden Administration to lift the ban entirely.
The LIFT campaign is a joint initiative of the Korea Peace Network, the Korea Peace Now! Grassroots Network, and Peace Treaty Now—national networks that organize for permanent peace in Korea.
NEW YORK—As talks between the United States and North Korea remain at an impasse, a new report shows that sanctions imposed on North Korea are having adverse consequences on humanitarian aid and economic development in the country, with a disproportionate impact on women.
The Human Costs and Gendered Impact of Sanctions on North Korea (PDF), which was produced by an international and multidisciplinary panel of independent experts, is the first comprehensive assessment of the human impact of sanctions against North Korea. Drawing on often neglected information from UN agencies on the ground as well as the authors’ combined expertise in public health, law, economics, history, and gender studies, the report also shows that existing UN mechanisms to exempt humanitarian-related items are insufficient to prevent these negative impacts, and, in fact, delays and funding shortfalls may have resulted in the deaths of thousands of people.
“As one of the few American physicians who has worked to deliver humanitarian aid and improve health care in North Korea, I have seen how sanctions have restricted the access to the most basic medicines and medical equipment in the isolated country,” said Kee Park, a lecturer at Harvard Medical School, the director of the DPRK Program at the Korean American Medical Association, and one of seven authors of the report. “This has made treating infectious diseases, chronic diseases, and injuries much more difficult.”
“Sanctions delayed the delivery of life-saving treatment for children with disabilities due to the ban on importing metal in medical and rehabilitation equipment,” added Joy Yoon, a co-author of the report and co-founder of the nonprofit organization Ignis Community, which treats children with developmental disabilities such as cerebral palsy and autism at its Pyongyang Spine Rehabilitation Center. “Without immediate and timely medical intervention, many North Korean children with cerebral palsy and other developmental disabilities do not survive.”
Henri Feron, a co-author of the report and a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy, said, “The findings in this report raise concerns that sanctions in their current form may be contrary to international law, in particular humanitarian and human rights norms. Sanctions also raise moral questions, as they effectively take the entire country’s population hostage.”
The Human Costs and Gendered Impact of Sanctions on North Korea was commissioned by Korea Peace Now! Women Mobilizing to End the War, a global campaign to educate, organize, and advocate for a Korea peace agreement, led by Women Cross DMZ, Nobel Women’s Initiative, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), and Korean Women’s Movement for Peace.
june 30 2019 wcdmz press release
Trump-Kim Letter for distribution press conf
FINAL DECLARATION- 2018 International Women Peace Walk Declaration